Jammu: The People’s Alliance for Gupkar Declaration (PAGD) emerged as the single largest coalition in the first local polls (District Development Council-DDC) in Jammu and Kashmir Union territory. In the DDC polls, Gupkar Alliance surged as single largest coalition in Kashmir Valley while the BJP kept in upper hand in the Jammu region. BJP wins 3 seats in the Kashmir region.
(more…)
Srinagar : Indian security force on Tuesday morning killed three terrorists at Turkwangam area of Sophian district , Jammu & Kashmir . Top commander of Hizb-ul-Mujahideen Zubair ul Islam Wani along with Kamran Manhas and Muneeb ul Haq were killed in Turkwangam encounter. Kamran Manhas from Zawoora was a relative of politician.
Thousands assemble for last rituals : Aurangzeb’s mortal remains have been conveyed to his local town in Poonch area. Individuals of the Salani town in Jammu and Kashmir won’t observe Eid, as it is a dark Eid for them.
A video of an Army shooter Aurangzeb surfaced on the web on Friday, in which the trooper, whose slug perplexed body was found in Kashmir on Thursday, in which he is seen being questioned by speculated Hizbul Mujahideen activists, about the experiences he had taken an interest in, authorities said.
Jammu & Kashmir: Mortal remains of Rifleman Aurangzeb brought to his native village in Poonch. He was abducted by terrorists and his body was found in Pulwama's Gusoo, on 14 June. pic.twitter.com/wplrkxDFRF
— ANI (@ANI) June 16, 2018
The video is accepted to be taken minutes previously the armed force jawan was killed by aggressors.
In the 1.5-minute-long video conceivably shot in a timberland territory, the trooper clad in pants and T-shirt is being asked by speculated Hizbul Mujahideen activists about his obligations, postings and experiences in which he had taken an interest, authorities said on Friday.
The shooter, who was ‘pal’ of an organization authority, was kidnapped by aggressors at Kalampora in Pulwama on Thursday morning when he was en route home in Rajouri area for Eid festivities.
#WATCH: Huge crowd gathers as mortal remains of Rifleman Aurangzeb are brought to his native village in Poonch. He was abducted by terrorists and his body was found in Pulwama's Gusoo, on 14 June. #JammuAndKashmir pic.twitter.com/wMh0ZeSOCf
— ANI (@ANI) June 16, 2018
His body was found by a group of police and Army at Gussu town, around 10km far from Kalampora, in Pulwama area.
He was shot in his mind and neck, police said.
Aurangzeb had a place with 4 Jammu and Kashmir Light Infantry and was posted at the 44 Rashtriya Rifles camp at Shadimarg in Shopian, they said.
At around 9 am, armed force men from the unit halted an auto requesting that the driver drop Aurangzeb in Shopian, authorities stated, relating what had happened.
Aggressors halted the vehicle as it moved toward Kalampora and stole the jawan.
Responding to the improvement, previous boss priest Omar Abdullah tweeted, “Another bit of appalling news to add to an effectively ghastly day. May Aurangzeb rest in peace. Allah Jannat naseeb karay(sic).”
Later in the day, veteran columnist and ‘Rising Kashmir’ manager Shujaat Bukhari and his two individual security officers (PSOs) were shot dead by psychological militants outside the daily paper’s office in the core of Jammu and Kashmir’s mid year capital.
(This Story Originating From INDIATODAY)
Jammu: A 22-year-old man was killed on Friday after Pakistani troops depended on terminating from little arms on Indian Army posts along the Line of Control (LoC) in Jammu and Kashmir’s Poonch area, a cop said.
There was little arms terminating by Pakistani troops along the LoC in the area’s Gulpur-Bagyal Dhara belt, the cop told PTI.
The Pakistan Army started terminating around 12:30 am on Indian Army posts in Baghal Dhara, he said.
The Indian Army struck back viably, the officer said.
The expired was distinguished as Mohammad Ikhlaq, an inhabitant of Kalsan Malti Baghal Dhara. He endured genuine wounds and kicked the bucket on the recognize, the officer said.
The man was murdered amid a marriage work in a territory near the LoC. A projectile terminated by from over the outskirt hit Ikhlaq, he said.
There has been a spurt in truce infringement along the LoC and the International Border (IB) in Jammu and Kashmir this year, bringing about the demise of 31 individuals, including 16 security work force, in more than 700 such occurrences.
(This Story Originating From FIRSTPOST)
BJP : Association HRD serve Prakash Javadekar today criticized the Congress party for their current midnight candlelight vigil over the Kathua gangrape case. He stated, “Need to ask Rahul Gandhi, why they never took out a light walk for Nirbhaya.”
Talking about the renunciation of two BJP priests, Javadekar stated, “Our two clergymen went to speak to the assumptions of neighborhood populace, notwithstanding this we made a move and the two pastors have surrendered. ”
He guaranteed equity for the eight-year-old Kathua young lady’s family and guaranteed correctional activity against the offenders.
“At the point when Congress lost 2014 decisions, their race operator was a legal counselor, who requested that the denounced for the situation ought not be delivered in the court. Why is Azad Ji noiseless? Rahul Gandhi ought to request Ghulam Mir’s renunciation instantly,” said the Union HRD serve.
“Jammu Congress says nearby populace trusts that all charged are exiting free, everything is propelled. We need to ask Rahul Gandhi that two BJP pastors have surrendered and we are making a move while you take out a flame walk with no goal to discover an answer,” he included further.
Congress hit back at BJP saying that Opposition has each privilege to scrutinize the decision government.
“As to the extent issues identified with ladies are worried, in the last 13-14 days you have instances of monstrosities against ladies being reported…after weight from Opposition and media, we saw lip benefit by PM and he expressed few words…two clergymen were expelled simply after weight,” said Congress pioneer Pawan Khera.
In another arrangement of improvements, the legal advisors showing up for the Kathua gangrape casualty’s family have apparently chosen to document an application in the Supreme Court, asking that the case be exchanged out of the Jammu and Kashmir High Court.
Stewing strain in the state over the ruthless Kathua gangrape is accepted to be the purpose for advocates Talib Hussain and Deepkika Singh Rajawat’s choice.
The Jammu and Kashmir Police Crime Branch had before documented a chargesheet in the Kathua pack assault and murder case, revealing a malicious arrangement brought forth to purportedly ‘oust’ a gathering of Bakherwal Muslim wanderers from a town close Jammu.
The fierce assault and murder of the eight-year-old young lady in Kathua has stood out as truly newsworthy the nation over, halfway because of the help the minor’s charged attackers have gotten in Jammu and Kashmir.
(This Story Originating From INDIATODAY)
Kathua Assault Case : One of the center esteems that we hold dear as a majority rule government is that we live in a country administered by laws. A country represented by laws is one where the organization of equity is done in a precise manner without disturbance. Supporters in this nation are officers that serve in that framework. It is a calling that should be honorable some time ago. It may not be respectable now, but rather advocates, as officers of the court, still have an obligation to guarantee the course of equity isn’t debased. They shouldn’t be judges, they should help judges in arriving at a conclusion that is as per law.
This, sadly, doesn’t appear to be the situation in Jammu and Kashmir. At the point when the episode occurred at Kathua, one expected that everybody would meet up to help the legal hardware in guaranteeing that the organization of equity was not disturbed. Legal counselors would be there to speak to the denounced. different legal counselors would be there to help the state in the indictment. Some different legal advisors would be there at the Bar of the High Court utilizing their sharpness to raise this issue as one of open intrigue.
Be that as it may, rather, the most recent couple of days have seen the most exceedingly bad of this calling turn out. J&K Police have enlisted FIRs against individuals from the Kathua Magistrate’s Court Bar Association who held up a challenge against the seven denounced being chargesheeted for the assault and murder of a 8-year-old. They obstructed the workplace of the Crime Branch to keep the police from documenting the chargesheet. A chargesheet is only a charge, it isn’t confirmation of blame or purity. In the event that they thought the denounced were guiltless, it is a contention that should have been taken up in court. The law after all presumes blamelessness. It is no reason to hinder a chargesheet. It is no reason to keep the police from doing their employments.
What exacerbates the situation is that the Jammu and Kashmir High Court Bar Association has required a strike on Thursday to challenge. They aren’t dissenting the activities of their partners in endeavoring to obstruct a court continuing. They are dissenting the way that the police made a move against these legal counselors.
At the start, it should be recollected that legal counselors don’t have a privilege to strike. The Supreme Court in a catena of judgments has confirmed this position. In Ex-Captian Harish Uppal v Union of India, the Supreme Court (2003) 2 SCC 45 held:
“In conclusion it is held that legal advisors have no privilege to go on strike or give a call for blacklist, not even on a token strike.
The challenge, if any is required, must be by giving press proclamations, TV interviews, completing of Court premises standards as well as notices, sporting dark or white or any shading arm groups, serene shield walks outside and far from Court premises, going on dharnas or transfer fasts and so forth. It is held that attorneys holding Vakalats for the benefit of their customers can’t not go to Courts in compatibility to a call for strike or boycott.All legal counselors should strikingly decline to keep any call for strike or blacklist. No attorney can be chatted with any unfriendly outcomes by the Association or the Council and no danger or pressure of any nature including that of removal can be waited. It is held that no Bar Council or Bar Association can allow assembling of a conference for motivations behind thinking about a call for strike or blacklist and order, assuming any, for such gathering must be overlooked. It is held that lone in the rarest of uncommon situations where the poise, respectability and freedom of the Bar and additionally the Bench are in question, Courts may overlook (choose not to see) to a dissent abstention from work for not over one day.
It is being illuminated that it will be for the Court to choose whether or not the issue includes pride or uprightness or autonomy of the Bar or potentially the Bench.
Subsequently in such cases the President of the Bar should first counsel the Chief Justice or the District Judge before Advocate choose to truant themselves from Court. The choice of the Chief Justice or the District Judge would be last and must be kept the Bar. It is held that Courts are under no commitment to suspend matters since legal advisors are on strike.
Despite what might be expected, it is the obligation of all Courts to go ahead with issues on their sheets even without legal counselors. As such, Courts must not be aware of strikes or calls for blacklists. It is held that if a legal counselor, holding a Vakalat of a customer, refrains from going to Court because of a strike call, he should be actually at risk to pay costs which should be expansion to harms which he may need to pay his customer for misfortune endured by him.”
Further, regardless of whether legal counselors need to go on strike, they can’t go on strike to attempt and deviant the course of equity. They can’t strike in light of the fact that a FIR has been enlisted against individuals who endeavored to hinder the police from recording a chargesheet. This circumstance verges on the odd, yet figures out how to incite sicken.
The legal counselors who endeavored to obstruct the chargesheet and the individuals who went on strike on Thursday to keep equity from following all the way through are a disfavor to the calling. They ought not be permitted to keep honing. Their direct has conveyed offensiveness not simply to the Bar at Jammu and Kashmir yet to the whole Indian Bar. On the off chance that they are permitted to stay in the calling, it will be a stain that will be difficult to clean. Their banish cards should be taken from them. The Bar Council needs to start disciplinary procedures at the most punctual.
(This Story Originating From FIRSTPOST)
 emerged as the single largest coalition in the DDC Polls while BJP surge as single big){kind=link}
